The Fed Investigates JP Morgan?

Editor’s Notes – The fed has two mandates. 1) Price stability. 2) Maximum employment. Why are they tasked with regulating banks now? What is even more disconcerting (or should be anyway) is that JPMorgan is one of the primary shareholders of the fed to begin with. The idea of the fed investigating JP makes about as much sense as conspiring to throw Brer Rabbit in the briar patch.

Federal Reserve officials are gathering more information about the trading position that led to a $2 billion loss at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), which they have known about for several weeks, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Fed officials don’t view it as their role to approve or reject individual trades at banks, the person said. Rather, their job is to ensure the firms have sufficient capital to withstand losses, said the person, who wasn’t authorized to discuss the matter and asked not to be identified.

JPMorgan Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon announced the “egregious” trading loss yesterday, two months after the biggest U.S. bank by assets passed a Fed stress test that put its loans and securities through a scenario of deep recession and a simulated global financial market shock.

“This is the way the system should work,” said Mark Calabria, a former Senate Banking Committee staff member and now director of financial regulation studies at the Cato Institute in Washington. “The capital should be there to actually absorb losses.”

At the same time, JPMorgan’s announcement points to gaps in the Fed’s enforcement of governance and risk management, said Robert Eisenbeis, a former research director at the Atlanta Fed.

‘Watching the Store’

“The fact that Jamie Dimon could come out and make some of those statements” raises “lots of questions about who was watching the store,” said Eisenbeis, who is now chief monetary economist at Sarasota, Florida-based Cumberland Advisors. The Fed “ought to be going in and looking at the internal controls and monitoring procedures that the institution is taking, and stress those.”

Krishna Guha, a spokesman for Federal Reserve Bank of New York, JPMorgan’s regulator, declined to comment. JPMorgan spokesman Joseph Evangelisti also declined to comment.

The Financial Stability Oversight Council, a group of regulators charged with preventing a financial crisis, wasn’t convened to discuss the JPMorgan loss and had no plans to meet, said a Treasury Department official who declined to be identified. The council is chaired by Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and includes Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke.

JPMorgan’s tier 1 common capital ratio, a measure of capital strength tracked by the Fed, never dipped below 5 percent in the 2012 stress scenario despite a hypothetical $28 billion in trading and counterparty losses and $56 billion in loan losses, according to results of the stress tests released on March 13.

Capital Buffers

“I don’t think this particular number is big enough to get in the way of the capital buffers that JPMorgan has,” Robert Engle, winner of the Nobel Prize in economics, said of the $2 billion loss.

“We think of JPMorgan as being one of the more systemic institutions because it is so big,” said Engle, a professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business, who helped develop a model of systemic risk at the school’s Volatility Lab. “But because it is big, a loss like this is not going to bring it to its knees.”

JPMorgan shares fell 9.3 percent to $36.96 at the close of trading today in New York. The KBW Bank Index of 24 financial stocks was down 1.2 percent to 46.40.

Separately, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the main U.S. derivatives regulator, has been reviewing JPMorgan’s derivatives trading activities since last month, according to another person who was briefed on the matter.

The CFTC hasn’t opened an enforcement action against the bank, according to the person, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the review is private.

The Next Bubble? – Andy Sutton

Since the housing bubble burst spectacularly in late 2007, many analysts have been actively seeking out the next likely explosion. Rest assured, it will be related to debt in some way. US Treasuries, credit cards, and potentially another disaster on Wall Street thanks to over-leveraging have all been mentioned as potential leading candidates. However, there is another bubble out there and it too is debt related. This one, in my opinion, has far greater consequences because it involves a group that is the least financially able to deal with the ramifications. I’m talking about student loans and the massive bubble that has been expanding for at least the past decade.

I can remember a time back in the 1980s when I had several relatives put themselves through state schools by working during the summer and on holidays. They either didn’t carry student loans, or if they did, they were exceedingly small. Granted, these were not Ivy League institutions or anything like that, but it was possible to get an education without going bankrupt. If parents were able to kick in a few bucks, many kids could walk out of college either debt free or very close to it. Credit cards for college students were virtually unheard of.

Fast-forward a couple of decades and for college students who have credit cards, the average balance upon gradation is around $4,000 while the average debt of people in the 19-24 age group is nearly double that. It is not uncommon for a kid to leave college these days with $50,000 or more in student loans. That might not sound like much, but when you’re talking about people who have nothing in the way of serious work history or experience to present to potential employers and a job market that resembles the aftermath of a major hurricane, $50,000 suddenly becomes a lot of money.

It has been common knowledge for many years now that the cost of a college education has been increasing at a significantly faster rate than most other costs. There has been grand speculation as to why this is the case, but I’m going to use a parallel example and simple economics to explain why this is so. First, our society has been somewhat conditioned to believe that a college education is a birthright of every American. Secondly, for years now we’ve been shown statistics on the lifetime earnings of people with college degrees versus those without. It is the natural ‘next step’ if you will once high school has been completed. I have spent a lot of time over the years working with young people and many have no idea what they want to do for a career, but are urged by parents, guidance counselors, and the universities themselves to explore their interests. In the 80s that might have been reasonable advice. However, now this advice is not only impractical, it borders on insane.

The Economics of Student Loans – 101

Simply put, we have a society that by and large feels a college education is both a necessity and an entitlement. This creates a huge demand. However, much of that demand would not be satiated were it not for government. The idea of guaranteed student loans has monetized virtually all of the demand. This guarantees income for universities and they similarly behave as if their cash stream is not dependent on performance, market factors or anything else. They treat their cash flows as an annuity in perpetuity. And unfortunately, we’ve taught them that they can raise their tuition at double or even triple the rate of the cost of living and all the seats will be full at the start of each year.

The above graphic depicts the cost of tuition versus housing and the CPI. Notice that housing has already retreated to 2003-ish levels. Notice also how the CPI is represented by an almost perfect straight line – an almost laughable impossibility over a 30-year period. Tuition, however, continues to rise and our kids continue to fall further into debt.

For comparative purposes, let’s take a look at the situation in housing. Why did we have a housing bubble? Because mortgages essentially became guaranteed to virtually anyone that wanted one. We’ve been brainwashed to believe we’re not living the American dream if we don’t ‘own’ a home. And the government has once again stepped in and created entities to absorb all this misplaced demand. Where the housing market has Fannie Mae, the student loan world has Sallie Mae. The parallels are undeniable. Unfortunately, the dream of home ownership has become a nightmare for millions of Americans.

Similarly the panacea of having a college degree has also become a nightmare for millions of our kids. Many of them have been out of college for several years now and still can’t find work in their field of study. They’re waiting tables or performing other retail type labor. And with the job market saturated in many areas, they’re being forced to compete against more experienced workers, who are willing to work cheap just to have a job to support their families.

The Implications of Student Loan Debt

What is likely the worst part of this bubble is that nobody really knows how big it is. Many private analysts peg the outstanding debt at over $1 trillion, while the NY Fed claims the outstanding debt is $867 billion, using Equifax data. While even the larger of the two numbers pales in comparison to the outstanding mortgage debt from our earlier example, remember that the debtors in the case of student loans generally have nothing in the way of savings or assets. For the most part they are 100% dependent on the labor market to provide a salary that not only covers their cost of living, but allows them to meet their debt obligations as well.

In increasing levels, students are finding this to be an impossible task. The graphics below depict default rates both in the aggregate and by state on federal loans only. Keep in mind that technically a student loan is not in default until the debtor is 270 days in arrears. So if a student makes a payment once every 9 months, the loan is technically not in default, although from the debtor’s standpoint, it might as well be when penalties and interest are factored in.

What are not oftentimes mentioned in the statistics are the implications of defaults on student loans as well. For all intent and purposes they might as well be taxes. They cannot be discharged through bankruptcy proceedings like most other types of debt, and are unsecured as well. The bank (now the government) can’t repossess your other belongings to satisfy student loan debt. It is literally an albatross that cannot be escaped. Defaulting will make it much more difficult to get other types of credit too – at least at a reasonable rate. And the interest rates on certain types of student loans can be upwards of 15% if a parent or guardian isn’t willing to cosign the note.

I am not an advocate of walking away from debts, so the best advice is to urge students to become as aware as possible of what they’re walking into beforehand.

Some Helpful Tips

If you know of someone who is considering college as an option, there are a couple of tips you can give them in terms of guidance and whether or not college is a viable option.

1) What is the job market likely to be like in the field of study they’re considering? It is important not to look at the market currently, but rather what are the medium and long-term prospects? Does it make good common sense that their career path has longevity? Granted, many folks end up in fields they never considered when they were 18 – yours truly is a prime example. However, given the tight job market and the fact that it is likely to remain so, today’s entrants into the workforce had best be prepared to find a ‘good job’ and, if possible, stay put.

2) What type of education is necessary to enter into a particular field?  Many times, students will opt for a 4-year degree when it is only necessary to have a 2-year degree to get a job. There are still employers who offer help with tuition. If you’re one of those who only need an Associate degree, consider getting it and then finishing out your education with assistance from an employer or even taking a class at a time on your own.

3) Does the institution really matter? Many students improperly feel that they need a degree from a prestigious institution to get a job. That may be true depending on the field, but there are lots of examples where a state school education will get you a job just as easily as if you went to a private school. Again, researching your area of career interest will give plenty of direction in this regard.

4) A college education is an investment and must be treated as such. I have talked to many kids who want to chase their dreams and do it as a career. If it happens to make financial sense, then go for it. However, in many cases it just doesn’t make sense. I’m not being a hard case here either. 30 years ago it didn’t matter as much, but today a decision to embark on the pathway to a college degree has enormous financial implications. Many kids have found a career they like that will allow them to be financially secure while they pursue dreams (such as music or art) outside the work arena.

Consumer Credit Expands by Largest Amount in a Decade

Editor’s Note – Hats off to Neil Dutta for actually tagging one of the real causes for the explosion in student debt. In reality, the jobs situation only magnifies the root cause of the rapid growth in student loan debt – the guarantee of availability of loans by the USGovt. Remember Fannie and Freddie and what happened when the USGovt started ostensibly guaranteeing home mortgages? What makes the student loan mess even more despicable is that most of these kids are entering a job market with no real hope of any sustained expansion. College is no longer an investment, but an albatross – courtesy of Uncle Sam.

Consumer borrowing in the U.S. surged in March by the most in more than a decade on growing demand for educational financing and autos.

Credit rose by $21.4 billion, the biggest gain since November 2001, to $2.54 trillion, Federal Reserve figures showed today in Washington. The advance was paced by a $16.2 billion jump in non-revolving debt, including student and car loans.

Americans may have been trying to get school financing before a possible increase in interest rates takes place on July 1. Rising consumer confidence also means that households are more willing to take on debt to boost spending, which accounts for about 70 percent of the economy.

“There was a burst of borrowing in March as warm weather pulled forward spring shopping and auto sales were strong,” said Julia Coronado, chief economist for North America at BNP Paribas in New York. “Student loan growth continues to be very strong and a little worrisome. Smoothing through the monthly volatility consumers are becoming a little more comfortable with borrowing to buy cars.”

Stocks rose following the biggest weekly decline in 2012, led by bank shares. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index climbed 0.2 percent to 1,371.1 at 3:30 p.m. in New York.

The increase in consumer credit topped the $9.8 billion median forecast of 33 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. It also exceeded the highest estimate, with projections ranging from increases of $4.5 billion to $15 billion.

Government Lending

The surge in non-revolving debt followed a $11.6 billion gain in February, today’s report showed. The Fed’s data don’t track debt secured by real estate, such as home equity lines of credit. Lending by the federal government, which is mainly for student loans, climbed by $6.9 billion before adjusting for seasonal variations.

The rate on the student loans is set to double on July 1 without action by Congress. The rate increase would affect about 7.4 million students, according to the White House, adding an average of $1,000 a year in payments on college loans.

President Barack Obama last week sought to keep pressure on Congress to freeze the interest rate on federally subsidized student loans, saying a higher education can’t be an unaffordable luxury for middle-income Americans.

Some economists were concerned the jump in educational lending reflected a poor job market.

Jobs Outlook

“Most of the improvement in credit is a function of the explosion student loan debt,” said Neil Dutta, an economist at Bank of America Corp. in New York. “The reason student loan debt is exploding? Because the youth population is having difficulty finding work. Hardly a good reason for credit extension.”

Revolving debt, which includes credit cards, increased by $5.2 billion, the first gain in three months, according to the Fed’s statistics.

Consumer confidence climbed to a four-year high in early April, according to the Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index.

Americans are buying more cars as hiring and the economy improve. Sales of cars and light trucks have exceeded a 14 million annual pace in each of the past four months, the best performance since 2008, according to figures from Ward’s Automotive Group.

General Motors Co. (GM), the world’s largest automaker, said first-quarter U.S. sales climbed 2.7 percent to an industry- leading 608,320, helped by the Chevrolet Cruze and Malibu sedans.

Chrysler Group LLC led the five largest automakers by U.S. sales in exceeding analysts’ estimates for April as the industry’s increased production drove expansion in the manufacturing sector.

A Must-Read for Those Under Thirty

Published on: 05/07/2012
Categories: Current Events, Economics
Comments: 1 Comment

Editor’s Note – This should not be taken as a political endorsement, but rather is presented for those who are willing to think critically about the myriad fiscal and economic issues facing this country.

If you’re 30 or older, stop reading. This isn’t for you. This is for America’s sacrificial lambs — our children.

Young men and women, boys and girls. Gather round. I’m writing something you crave, but seldom get — the truth.

The truth is we grownups don’t care about you. Oh, we care here and there about the few of you we know or raised, but as a group, you aren’t collectively on our minds or in our hearts. You may be our earthly posterity, but you’re not really our concern or problem.

Instead, we’re your problem. We’ve squandered your bodies and lives in wars with no point and no end. We’ve laid waste to the economy, leaving you scrambling for scarce jobs at low pay. We’ve played take-as-you-go fiscal policy for six decades, placing you at the dirty end of an extravagant chain letter. We’ve made our Social Security your private insecurity, our healthcare, your tax obligation, our financial crisis your unemployment. We’ve shortchanged your education, but made you pick up the bill. We’ve left Wall Street to prey on you at each stage of your lives. And we’ve staged an ongoing political sideshow to distract you from our economic child abuse.

That stage is set. The politicians, clothed in red and blue, are now taking the field to defend the rich against the poor and the poor against the rich, when the real war pits us against you — the old against the young. Whichever candidate wins this year’s battle of billions, generational exploitation will prevail and the real loser will be you.

Your loss will sadly be your fault. For you suffer from love. You love us too much. And your love has left you bewildered and disarmed.

How can people you love destroy your future? How can they turn your first-world country into a third-world wannabe, with 27 million people out of work or short on work, a fiscal gap of $211 trillion, massive official deficits, enormous trade deficits, a Social Security system in record trouble, a Medicare system with exponentially exploding costs, a Medicaid system with exponentially exploding costs, an employer-based health insurance tax subsidy with exponentially exploding costs, a new health exchange system with potentially exponentially exploding costs, a national saving rate close to zero, a domestic investment rate close to zero, a real wage growth rate close to zero, a central bank printing money at an astronomical rate, an inflation rate poised to explode, an education system that’s flunking, an energy policy that’s destroying your health and the planet’s climate, and a 20 percent and rapidly growing child poverty rate.

You have two choices. You can sit back and pretend nothing can change, that you have no power, and no time to get involved. Or you can gather everyone you know, join my campaign at www.kotlikoff2012.org, and save our country while there is still time.

Fed Officials – US on Edge of Fiscal ‘Cliff’

Two Federal Reserve officials warned Tuesday that the U.S. could be heading for a “fiscal cliff” at year’s end if mandated tax increases and spending cuts are implemented.

Charles Evans of the Chicago Fed called the cliff a “big uncertainty” while Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart said there could be a “financial shock” if markets begin to anticipate that Congress and the White House do little to address this situation.

The expected tax increases and spending cuts were triggered when a congressional “super committee” failed to come up with a way of closing the federal budget deficit.

Both Fed officials spoke during the Milken conference in Los Angeles. Earlier Tuesday, on CNBC, both agreed the slowing U.S. economy is disappointing, but differed on the need for continued stimulus.

“I’d like nothing better than to start raising rates before late 2014 on the strength of a stronger economy,” Evans told Squawk on the Street.

Noting there’s “tremendous room” for more accommodation, the Chicago Fed chief said that “more liquidity would be helpful. It would ratify the idea that [Fed] policy is going to be accommodative for a very long time to get things going. Look, we might get lucky in the sense that … the channel opens up and we get a greater lift in the economy.”

Rather than keeping rates low until late 2014, Evans thinks the Fed should use “economic triggers” on which to base accommodation such as keeping low rates if the unemployment rate is above 7.5 percent “unless inflation unexpectedly goes up to a very high level, say 3 percent.”

Lockhart is more skeptical and also concerned about triggering higher inflation. The Atlanta Fed president said that while the first-quarter GDP and March jobs data were disappointing, “I am a bit reticent to pull the trigger on any action. We have to see how the economy evolves. Pulling a number out of the air is a bit too simplistic.”

He added, “There’s only so much we can do to stimulate loan demand, and to change the risk appetite of the financial system or banks, so I’m not sure that more really active stimulus in the form of quantitative easing, for example, would have that much of an effect. But the longer-term costs have to be kept in mind, costs related to inflation expectations, for example.”

Both Fed presidents said they know the continued low interest rates are hurting savers.

“We’re in a tough situation and the current slow recovery is hurting everybody,” said Evans.

Lockhart noted that “we can only have one policy, and that policy is designed to support the recovery. So unfortunately there are winners and losers.”

Still on the Fence? – Andy Sutton

Lost among never-ending talk in the mainstream media about the ‘modest recovery’ being experienced in America have been some rather poignant headlines that are telling a completely different story. I’ve used up many weeks to outline the flaws regarding how our economic growth is measured and suggest more responsible alternatives. I don’t expect Washington to change, however. Those suggestions are for ‘We the People’ as we navigate our own individual situations and seek to do the things necessary in order that we are better prepared to deal with the undeniable consequences of gross mismanagement by our government.

However, at the same time I have noticed that many people who are still on the fence in terms of understanding where we’re really at present a unique problem. Most people will believe anything they hear on television or read in a newspaper and accept it at face value. It becomes fact and, in many cases, they will parrot what they’ve heard or read as their own opinion. To the contrary if one endeavors to challenge the mainstream, we must be armed with facts and arguments that are concise, salient, and provable beyond any reasonable doubt.  The good news is we have common sense and facts on our side. The bad news is that common sense is in short supply these days as is a willingness to face reality.

This article is for all you folks who are still on the fence, not quite sure of where we are and where we’re headed. In it I will offer two rather important facts about our society that will hopefully help you recognize that we are not better off than we were a few years ago. Things are in fact getting worse – from many different points of view, and this has been going on for much longer than most would even realize.

Food Stamp Use Up 70% Since 2007

There were many of us outside the mainstream who called the recession in mid to late 2007. My alternative measurement of economic output (based on the Cobb-Douglas output model) puts the beginning in mid to late 2006. At the time, the government was running what were already considered to be unsustainable budget deficits and those deficits were nothing compared to what we’re seeing now. The point is that government borrowing and spending was able to postpone the recession from hitting Main Street for about a year. Don’t forget also that the housing market was in the process of putting in a huge top. People were still using their homes as their own personal ATM machines and running up their credit cards.

However, by 2007, we witnessed a monumental shift of our society. People, now running out of their own ammo, started turning to the government. In the case of food stamps, also known as SNAP, they began to rely on the government for their daily bread in larger and larger numbers. That trend is still intact today. Food stamp use has increased every month for at least the last three years if not even longer. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) recently released its data through 2011 on food stamp use. 45 million people received food stamp assistance in 2011, a 70% increase over the number receiving assistance in 2007. 45 million doesn’t really sound like a huge amount, especially considering that our population is over 300 million. This constitutes about one in 7 people. If you’re at work and reading this, pay attention to the next 7 people who walk by your desk. Statistically, one of them is on food stamps.

It still might not seem like a big deal, but when you figure that the number has almost doubled in 5 years and is expected to continue to grow until at least 2014 (by the CBO), it suddenly becomes a bigger deal. When you figure that the government borrows almost 50 cents out of every dollar it spends, it makes the reality even more grim. Statistically at least, the government is borrowing money from banks and foreigners to help feed about 20 million people in this country. Still sound like no big deal?

The CBO went on to say that about 2/3 of the increase in total spending on the food stamp program was due to an increase in participants in the program. Another 20% was due to temporarily increased benefit amounts as a result of the 2009 stimulus bill passed by Congress. Many of us told you the stimulus was a joke. It was supposed to stimulate the economy, but buried in there was an increase in food stamp benefits. How is that supposed to stimulate the economy? My personal guess is that the increase was to cover inflation created by the fed to cover all the bailouts and promises made to the banksters. If that is indeed the case, you can forget about the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the fed and their ridiculous assertion that inflation runs at about 2-2.5% per annum in perpetuity.

Anecdotally, the CBO said use of food stamp benefits would decrease after 2014 because the economy would be improving, but it also warned that usage would remain high by historical standards. 2014 huh? What about the ongoing ‘modest recovery’ we hear about constantly? If nothing else, you’ll hopefully be able to see that the left ear has no idea what the right mouth is saying and vice versa. Maybe the CBO and the Commerce Dept. should have a meeting and get their propaganda straight.

Social Security Disability Applications Skyrocket

Social Security Disability or SSDI is a program that pays benefits to workers who have earned ‘credits’ by paying into the Social Security Ponzi scheme. In many cases, even workers who have not earned credits are eligible for benefits as are their dependents under certain circumstances. People who open a claim for SSDI are also eligible for Medicaid benefits. There have been many documented cases of abuse of all of these support systems, but there has also been a dramatic increase in legitimate claims as well.

Since the beginning of 2009 more than 5.4 million workers have signed up for disability benefits. According to government data, since the recession officially ‘ended’ (sic) in 2009, the number of applicants for SSDI has been nearly twice the number of jobs created. And remember they are using BLS numbers when they talk about the number of jobs created. Many others, myself included, have repeatedly demonstrated the outright misrepresentation and fraud in the BLS’ reporting methodologies. To put it in a nutshell, the odds are overwhelming that there are several SSDI applicants per job ‘created’ rather than just two. Again, per government data, these are discouraged workers who are dropping off the unemployment rolls and out of the work force and, as they give up looking for work, are turning to the government for assistance.

Here’s a synopsis from a quote in Investor’s Business Daily:

“As a result, by April there were 10.8 million people on disability, according to Social Security Administration data released this week. Even after accounting for all those who’ve left the program — mainly because they hit retirement age or died — that’s up 53% from a decade ago.”

<ALT>WEBdis0419.eps<COPY>Investor's Business Daily

The proportion of those on disability compared to the overall workforce has been steadily increasing since the early 1990s as well (see above graphic). Ironically, if you take a look at when consumer debt burdens really started to accelerate, we’re in the same time window. Coincidence? You decide.

There has been no cross-referencing to date that I’m aware of regarding how many SNAP participants are also on SSDI, but the chances are pretty good there is some overlap. It has become a widely accepted fact in economic circles that the number of households completely dependent on government programs is on the rise. Remember, we’re only dealing with two programs here. Don’t forget there are still Medicare, Medicaid, Medigap, LI-HEAP to be considered and the list goes on and on. This article is only scratching the surface of the increasing dependence on government.

I think that after seeing this information one would be able to construct a rather sound argument that the government is borrowing a good deal of money in order to support an increasingly dependent society, and concurrently, is doing an awful lot of opinion shaping to keep this fact under the radar. Does this sound like a healthy economic environment to you? Reliance on the state might be the ‘in’ thing right now, but we’ve already seen the tragic failure of such thinking and policy in Europe. Those who believe we’re immune just because we live in America are in for a rude awakening.

Food Stamp Use Up 70% Since 2007

Editor’s Note: Couple this with the post below on disability benefits. We certainly are becoming a very ‘dependent’ society. If the economy were really getting better, these trends would be going in the opposite direction.

The Congressional Budget Office said Thursday that 45 million people in 2011 received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, a 70% increase from 2007. It said the number of people receiving the benefits, commonly known as food stamps, would continue growing until 2014.

Spending for the program, not including administrative costs, rose to $72 billion in 2011, up from $30 billion four years earlier. The CBO projected that one in seven U.S. residents received food stamps last year.

In a report, the CBO said roughly two-thirds of jump in spending was tied to an increase in the number of people participating in the program, which provides access to food for the poor, elderly, and disabled. It said another 20% “of the growth in spending can be attributed to temporarily higher benefit amounts enacted in the” 2009 stimulus law.

CBO said the number of people receiving benefits is expected to fall after 2014 because the economy will be improving.

“Nevertheless, the number of people receiving SNAP benefits will remain high by historical standards,” the agency said.

It estimated that 34 million people, or 1 in 10 U.S. residents, would receive SNAP benefits in 2022 “and SNAP expenditures, at about $73 billion, will be among the highest of all non-health-related federal support programs for low-income households.”

Disability Rolls Reach New Highs

Edtor’s Note: Check out that chart. The number of people on disability has been going up since the early 1990′s. This coincides rather nicely with the time that consumer borrowing really started to take off. Let’s set aside the politics and think critically; does this have to do with who is in office or something more structural like the value of our money? You decide.

Complete Article with Chart

A record 5.4 million workers and their dependents have signed up to collect federal disability checks since President Obama took office, according to the latest official government data, as discouraged workers increasingly give up looking for jobs and take advantage of the federal program.

This is straining already-stretched government finances while posing a long-term economic threat by creating an ever-growing pool of permanently dependent working-age Americans.

Since the recession ended in June 2009, the number of people who’ve signed up for disability benefits is twice the job growth figure. (See nearby chart.) In just the first four months of this year, 539,000 joined the disability rolls and more than 725,000 put in applications.

As a result, by April there were 10.8 million people on disability, according to Social Security Administration data released this week. Even after accounting for all those who’ve left the program — mainly because they hit retirement age or died — that’s up 53% from a decade ago.

To be sure, disability rolls have grown steadily as a share of the workforce since the 1990s (see nearby chart).

The main causes of this broader trend, according to a study by economists David Autor and Mark Duggan, are the loosening of eligibility rules by Congress in 1984, the rise in disability benefits relative to wages, and the fact that more women have entered the workforce, making them eligible for disability.

Their research found that the aging of the population has contributed only modestly to the program’s growth.

But the big factor in the recent surge is the slow pace of the economic recovery after the severe recession. That has kept the unemployment rate above 8% and created an enormous pool of long-term unemployed and discouraged workers. More than 5 million people have been jobless for 27 weeks or more, nearly twice the previous high set in 1983, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“We see a lot of people applying for disability once their unemployment insurance expires,” said Matthew Rutledge, a research economist at Boston College’s Center for Retirement Research.

The number of applications last year was up 24% compared with 2008, Social Security Administration data show.

As the Congressional Budget Office explained : “When opportunities for employment are plentiful, some people who could quality for (disability insurance) benefits find working more attractive … when employment opportunities are scarce, some of these people participate in the DI program instead.”

Subsidizing Falling Wages with More Borrowing

Editor’s Note: Since the government knows real wages are falling, they put this beaut out there – collect unemployment even when you’re able to find a job at McDonalds or WalMart. Of course the entirety of this subsidy will be piled onto the already massive government debt (which you and your kids are responsible for paying off). Notice both parties were in favor of this which ought to tell you there is nobody in Washington who is really serious about any type of real reform. Any talk to the contrary is just lip service.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration is looking for states that will experiment with unemployment insurance programs by letting people test a job while still receiving benefits.

The plan is a key feature of a payroll tax cut package that President Barack Obama negotiated with congressional Republicans in February.

The Labor Department will open the application process Thursday for 10 model projects across the country. Any state can apply for the “Bridge to Work” program.

The plan is modeled after a Georgia program called “Georgia Works.” Under the plan, workers who have lost jobs can be placed in other temporary jobs as trainees for short periods to retain their skills or gain new ones while receiving jobless assistance. About a third of the time, those workers wind up getting hired full-time.

A number of states are combining unemployment benefits with on-the-job training, including North Carolina, New Hampshire, Utah and Missouri.

A senior administration official said those states would be eligible to apply for the federal demonstration project. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the program before an administration announcement.

States that are chosen could get waivers from the federal government allowing them to tap their unemployment insurance accounts to pay for such costs as transportation for workers in temporary jobs.

The program has had mixed results in some states that have their own programs. Administration officials said they hope the waivers and assistance offered by the federal demonstration projects could help rectify any problems that have emerged.

Supporters of the programs say it helps workers retain or learn new skills and add new job references to their resumes. The plan passed with support from leading Republicans, including House Speaker John Boehner and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.

It also is designed to answer critics of unemployment benefits who say the aid discourages some people from aggressively seeking work.

Recession Over? Think Again!

Editor’s Note: Once again, the real metrics unspoken of in the MSM have told the story. Seriously, how many times have you heard the term ‘velocity of circulation’ mentioned on CNBC??? The continued collapse of monetary velocity is indicative of an economy that is producing fewer and fewer actual transactions. Money is moving more slowly. Does that sound to you like the ‘modest recovery’ we keep hearing about on the news? I’d certainly hope not.

M2 Velocity of Circulation

 

page 1 of 48 »

Welcome , today is Friday, 05/18/2012